[PATCH] usb: host: ehci-tegra: Remove superfluous dev_err() message

[PATCH] usb: host: ehci-tegra: Remove superfluous dev_err() message

[Tang Bin]

The platform_get_irq() can print error message,so remove the redundant
dev_err() here.

Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin-0p4V/sDNsUmm0O/7XYngnFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
index d6433f206..75a075daf 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
@@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
 	if (!irq) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
 		err = -ENODEV;
 		goto cleanup_phy;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1.windows.1

Re: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-tegra: Remove superfluous dev_err() message

[Thierry Reding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 01:55:30PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() can print error message,so remove the redundant
> dev_err() here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin-0p4V/sDNsUmm0O/7XYngnFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-tegra: Remove superfluous dev_err() message

[Markus Elfring]

> The platform_get_irq() can print error message,so remove the redundant
> dev_err() here.

I suggest to adjust the commit message.

* How do you think about to use the text “usb: host: ehci-tegra:
  Remove an error message in tegra_ehci_probe()” as the commit subject?

* Would a wording like the following be nicer?

  The function “platform_get_irq” can log an error already.
  Thus remove a redundant message for the exception handling in the
  calling function.


…
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-tegra.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ static int tegra_ehci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>  	if (!irq) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
>  		err = -ENODEV;
>  		goto cleanup_phy;

I find another implementation detail questionable here.
The software documentation is providing the following information
for the used programming interface.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/base/platform.c?id=f5e94d10e4c468357019e5c28d48499f677b284f#n221
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.6.2/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L202

“…
 * Return: IRQ number on success, negative error number on failure.
…”

Would you like to reconsider the shown condition check?

Regards,
Markus