From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: tlb: Use the TLBI RANGE feature in arm64 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:21:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20200713172158.GE15829@gaia> References: <20200710094420.517-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <20200710094420.517-3-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <4040f429-21c8-0825-2ad4-97786c3fe7c1@nvidia.com> <7237888d-2168-cd8b-c83d-c8e54871793d@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7237888d-2168-cd8b-c83d-c8e54871793d-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Zhenyu Ye , will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, suzuki.poulose-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, maz-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, steven.price-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, guohanjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, xiexiangyou-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, prime.zeng-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org, zhangshaokun-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org, kuhn.chenqun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 03:44:16PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 13/07/2020 15:39, Zhenyu Ye wrote: > > On 2020/7/13 22:27, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> After this change I am seeing the following build errors ... > >> > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s: Assembler messages: > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:854: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:870: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1095: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1111: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1964: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1980: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2286: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2302: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4833: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4849: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5090: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5106: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:874: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1115: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1984: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2306: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4853: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5110: Error: attempt to move .org backwards > >> scripts/Makefile.build:280: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o' failed > >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o] Error 1 > >> scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm' failed > >> make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/mm] Error 2 > > > > The code must be built with binutils >= 2.30. > > Maybe I should add a check on whether binutils supports ARMv8.4-a instructions... > > Yes I believe so. The binutils guys in Arm confirmed that assembling "tlbi rvae1is" without -march=armv8.4-a is a bug. When it gets fixed, checking for the binutils version is not sufficient without passing -march. I think we are better off with a manual encoding of the instruction. -- Catalin