From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] gpu: host1x: Convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:25:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20200717142524.GA1218823@ulmo> References: <20200716090323.13274-1-miaoqinglang@huawei.com> <20200716133450.GJ535268@ulmo> <5684dcb3-c5a4-96c1-dd96-c44f5a94938f@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5684dcb3-c5a4-96c1-dd96-c44f5a94938f-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: miaoqinglang Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 09:32:21AM +0800, miaoqinglang wrote: >=20 > =E5=9C=A8 2020/7/16 21:34, Thierry Reding =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:03:23PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote: > > > From: Yongqiang Liu > > >=20 > > > Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/host1x/debug.c | 28 ++++------------------------ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > This doesn't apply. Can you please resend, based on something like > > linux-next? > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Thierry > Hi, Thierry >=20 > =C2=A0 Sorry I didn't mention it in commit log, but this patch is based on > linux-next where commit <4d4901c6d7> has switched over direct=C2=A0 seq_r= ead > method calls to seq_read_iter, this is why there's conflict in=C2=A0 your= apply. >=20 > =C2=A0 Do you think I should send a new patch based on 5.8rc? No need to. I'm about to send out the pull request for v5.9-rc1, so I'll just defer this to v5.10 since it doesn't look like it's anything urgent. Thierry --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEiOrDCAFJzPfAjcif3SOs138+s6EFAl8RtM8ACgkQ3SOs138+ s6Hj6g/+MgjmNXDQakxoDHLk0m84f7i97cY0lrI0Z0XFp0ZsuZp4VHLS0Rzd2wt8 3tb6OLbwu6Q456lBZIw/FKa7i4zJ3bRzV1+dnvZaXPWgVUzSRMEgo6AugBNGQqhy eQJH+5NfpN75sWFtXjhA/PscNW1v6oR/QkTKa2kcYFtP5xbSWHxVkdRUK/Xl5s15 TGaYsskrZehPE8k+6xNH6c0RIpt6ERO1NxnjrapApW3w98IYen1X8ONjILhJhjny ZjUJN3WbTaZVo7WtxZWG9G5AMR+5LK8qByRzjf1VoWWpFbiuZaPae/ewRFm8CZeg jNS3PYpAuSW9Bv0j5o2EEXUK4LV9gAC8ET140dTMmupSLH73Eu1ML7+Lm0TAGkK0 MPmJ8jLc0TMTERdA2Jt5s5sNZttMjaABxgPvl2igT+2zVA3yzyE1E3EO5qpyVQSF R2AWrcyc9gVdyCElBq5Z39td7OkL4ylG/sboo6xxudgW5gcYo2K2w541CEES9TKm JWeo5cf8YiBWcoF6ppg+OkTw61NILMjiMopyrd5ZDSOnwAi/oprOyGT7TfQJqazJ y78QPzi3GrAzlZzMovNWNw+7MIIuig0tYtxVMz1i5/uBAE89ngZjN+09a4G14q4z 0giSD+1Iya4q2w/DBhCIwiyhT53pHp76KrCj/+Xy1+8FUVHUprU= =J7AY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--