From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: tegra: Revert raw_violation_fixup for tegra124 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:30:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20200720113008.GA25297@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200717213510.171726-1-kwizart@gmail.com> <20200717215304.GA775582@bjorn-Precision-5520> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicolas Chauvet Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Manikanta Maddireddy , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:02:59AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 23:53, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit : > > > Thanks for the quick review. I've addressed all comments and I've > resubmitted a v2 to > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg96863.html > Unfortunately I've missed to modify the [Patch v2] tag. I hope this is > fine. Let me know if I need to resend. > > > Is v5.4.x really the oldest kernel that should get this fix? It looks > > like 191cd6fb5d2c appeared in v5.3. > The commit was introduced in 5.3 indeed. I've added 5.4.x since it's > the last maintained kernel from long term branches. > Now I'm using the Fixes: tag, I've dropped the version of the kernel > for stable as it seems duplicate and less accurate. I have applied this patch to pci/tegra, thanks. Lorenzo