linux-tegra.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Expend mutex protection range
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:15:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929011557.GA905@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <692b51fa-7a3e-dee7-b628-7cb2d2dc188d@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:17:58AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> ...
> >  static bool tegra_smmu_capable(enum iommu_cap cap)
> > @@ -420,17 +413,21 @@ static int tegra_smmu_as_prepare(struct tegra_smmu *smmu,
> >  				 struct tegra_smmu_as *as)
> >  {
> >  	u32 value;
> > -	int err;
> > +	int err = 0;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&smmu->lock);
> >  
> >  	if (as->use_count > 0) {
> >  		as->use_count++;
> > -		return 0;
> > +		goto err_unlock;
> 
> This looks a bit odd because it's not a error condition. Perhaps should
> be better to "goto bump_usecount"?
> 
> Or make it similar to tegra_smmu_as_unprepare()?

Hmm...I think it's simple to just make it "goto unlock" then.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-28 23:58 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Two followup changes Nicolin Chen
2020-09-28 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Unwrap tegra_smmu_group_get Nicolin Chen
2020-09-28 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Expend mutex protection range Nicolin Chen
2020-09-29  0:17   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-09-29  1:15     ` Nicolin Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200929011557.GA905@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).