[PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Dmitry Osipenko]

Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.

Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---

Changelog:

v2: - No changes. V1 got no attention, hence re-sending.

 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
index 191966dc8d02..29c5e83500d3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
@@ -135,13 +135,13 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
 {
 	int err;
 
-	if (tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware()) {
-		err = call_firmware_op(prepare_idle, TF_PM_MODE_LP2_NOFLUSH_L2);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
+	err = call_firmware_op(prepare_idle, TF_PM_MODE_LP2_NOFLUSH_L2);
+	if (err && err != -ENOSYS)
+		return err;
 
-		return call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
-	}
+	err = call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
+	if (err != -ENOSYS)
+		return err;
 
 	return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_pm_secondary_cpu_suspend);
 }
-- 
2.29.2

[PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] cpuidle: tegra: Remove do_idle firmware call

[Dmitry Osipenko]

The do_idle firmware call is unused by all Tegra SoCs, hence remove it in
order to keep driver's code clean.

Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---

Changelog:

v2: - No changes. V1 got no attention, hence re-sending.

 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
index 29c5e83500d3..508bd9f23792 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
@@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ enum tegra_state {
 static atomic_t tegra_idle_barrier;
 static atomic_t tegra_abort_flag;
 
-static inline bool tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware(void)
-{
-	return firmware_ops->prepare_idle && firmware_ops->do_idle;
-}
-
 static void tegra_cpuidle_report_cpus_state(void)
 {
 	unsigned long cpu, lcpu, csr;
@@ -139,10 +134,6 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
 	if (err && err != -ENOSYS)
 		return err;
 
-	err = call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
-	if (err != -ENOSYS)
-		return err;
-
 	return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_pm_secondary_cpu_suspend);
 }
 
@@ -356,9 +347,7 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * is disabled.
 	 */
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) {
-		if (!tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware())
-			tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);
-
+		tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);
 		tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_CC6);
 	}
 
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] cpuidle: tegra: Remove do_idle firmware call

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The do_idle firmware call is unused by all Tegra SoCs, hence remove it in
> order to keep driver's code clean.
> 
> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2: - No changes. V1 got no attention, hence re-sending.
> 
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 13 +------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> index 29c5e83500d3..508bd9f23792 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ enum tegra_state {
>  static atomic_t tegra_idle_barrier;
>  static atomic_t tegra_abort_flag;
>  
> -static inline bool tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware(void)
> -{
> -	return firmware_ops->prepare_idle && firmware_ops->do_idle;
> -}
> -
>  static void tegra_cpuidle_report_cpus_state(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long cpu, lcpu, csr;
> @@ -139,10 +134,6 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
>  	if (err && err != -ENOSYS)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
> -	if (err != -ENOSYS)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_pm_secondary_cpu_suspend);
>  }
>  
> @@ -356,9 +347,7 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	 * is disabled.
>  	 */
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) {
> -		if (!tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware())
> -			tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);

So firmware_ops->do_idle is always NULL, thus
tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware() is always false and
tegra_cpuidle_disable_state() always called, right ?


> +		tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);
>  		tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_CC6);
>  	}
>  
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] cpuidle: tegra: Remove do_idle firmware call

[Dmitry Osipenko]

02.03.2021 15:45, Daniel Lezcano пишет:
> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The do_idle firmware call is unused by all Tegra SoCs, hence remove it in
>> order to keep driver's code clean.
>>
>> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v2: - No changes. V1 got no attention, hence re-sending.
>>
>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 13 +------------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
>> index 29c5e83500d3..508bd9f23792 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
>> @@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ enum tegra_state {
>>  static atomic_t tegra_idle_barrier;
>>  static atomic_t tegra_abort_flag;
>>  
>> -static inline bool tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware(void)
>> -{
>> -	return firmware_ops->prepare_idle && firmware_ops->do_idle;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void tegra_cpuidle_report_cpus_state(void)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long cpu, lcpu, csr;
>> @@ -139,10 +134,6 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
>>  	if (err && err != -ENOSYS)
>>  		return err;
>>  
>> -	err = call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
>> -	if (err != -ENOSYS)
>> -		return err;
>> -
>>  	return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_pm_secondary_cpu_suspend);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -356,9 +347,7 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	 * is disabled.
>>  	 */
>>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) {
>> -		if (!tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware())
>> -			tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);
> 
> So firmware_ops->do_idle is always NULL, thus
> tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware() is always false and
> tegra_cpuidle_disable_state() always called, right ?

Yes, the tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7) is always
called if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled in kernel config.

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] cpuidle: tegra: Remove do_idle firmware call

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/03/2021 13:51, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 02.03.2021 15:45, Daniel Lezcano пишет:
>> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> The do_idle firmware call is unused by all Tegra SoCs, hence remove it in
>>> order to keep driver's code clean.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>>> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>> ---

[ ... ]

>>>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) {
>>> -		if (!tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware())
>>> -			tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7);
>>
>> So firmware_ops->do_idle is always NULL, thus
>> tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware() is always false and
>> tegra_cpuidle_disable_state() always called, right ?
> 
> Yes, the tegra_cpuidle_disable_state(TEGRA_C7) is always
> called if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled in kernel config.

Ok, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>



-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] cpuidle: tegra: Remove do_idle firmware call

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The do_idle firmware call is unused by all Tegra SoCs, hence remove it in
> order to keep driver's code clean.
> 
> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---

Applied, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
> this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
> to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
> firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
> C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
> 
> Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
> Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2: - No changes. V1 got no attention, hence re-sending.
> 
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> index 191966dc8d02..29c5e83500d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> @@ -135,13 +135,13 @@ static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
>  {
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware()) {
> -		err = call_firmware_op(prepare_idle, TF_PM_MODE_LP2_NOFLUSH_L2);
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> +	err = call_firmware_op(prepare_idle, TF_PM_MODE_LP2_NOFLUSH_L2);
> +	if (err && err != -ENOSYS)
> +		return err;
>  
> -		return call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
> -	}
> +	err = call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
> +	if (err != -ENOSYS)
> +		return err;
>  
>  	return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_pm_secondary_cpu_suspend);
>  }
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
> > this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
> > to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
> > firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
> > C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
> >
> > Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
> > Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> > Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> > Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> > Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

So do I gather correctly that I am expected to pick up this series?

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 04/03/2021 14:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
>>> this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
>>> to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
>>> firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
>>> C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
>>> Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>>> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>>> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> 
> So do I gather correctly that I am expected to pick up this series?

I had picked the cpuidle related patches in the past. As the traffic
became low, I assumed you directly pick them.

But I can take care of them and send a PR at -rc5 like before,
especially that we have new driver coming. It is not a problem.

Let me know what is you preferred way.


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:05 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2021 14:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
> >>> this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
> >>> to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
> >>> firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
> >>> C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
> >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
> >>> Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> >>> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> >>> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> >>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >
> > So do I gather correctly that I am expected to pick up this series?
>
> I had picked the cpuidle related patches in the past. As the traffic
> became low, I assumed you directly pick them.
>
> But I can take care of them and send a PR at -rc5 like before,
> especially that we have new driver coming. It is not a problem.
>
> Let me know what is you preferred way.

If you can take care of ARM-specific cpuidle changes, that'll help.

Thanks!

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 04/03/2021 15:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:05 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/2021 14:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:30 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>>> Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
>>>>> this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
>>>>> to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
>>>>> firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
>>>>> C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
>>>>> Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>>>>> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
>>>>> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>>>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> So do I gather correctly that I am expected to pick up this series?
>>
>> I had picked the cpuidle related patches in the past. As the traffic
>> became low, I assumed you directly pick them.
>>
>> But I can take care of them and send a PR at -rc5 like before,
>> especially that we have new driver coming. It is not a problem.
>>
>> Let me know what is you preferred way.
> 
> If you can take care of ARM-specific cpuidle changes, that'll help.

No problem, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] cpuidle: tegra: Fix C7 idling state on Tegra114

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 02/03/2021 10:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Trusted Foundation firmware doesn't implement the do_idle call and in
> this case suspending should fall back to the common suspend path. In order
> to fix this issue we will unconditionally set the NOFLUSH_L2 mode via
> firmware call, which is a NO-OP on Tegra30/124, and then proceed to the
> C7 idling, like it was done by the older Tegra114 cpuidle driver.
> 
> Fixes: 14e086baca50 ("cpuidle: tegra: Squash Tegra114 driver into the common driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.7+
> Reported-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@protonmail.com> # TF701 T114
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@protonmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com> # Ouya T30
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog