Re: [PATCH 09/10] arm64: tegra: Rework SOCTHERM on Tegra132 and Tegra210

Daniel Lezcano
2023-04-17T09:15:12Z

On 17/04/2023 11:06, Thierry Reding wrote:

[ ... ]

>>
>> If the hardware mitigation is 'heavy', don't you want to have DVFS acting
>> before hardware throttling ?
>
> The throttling here is in fact some form of DVFS, but yes, generally we
> would likely want to have additional forms of DVFS before we reach this
> state. We could add CPU cooling devices and there's also a mechanism to
> throttle the DRAM frequency on certain boards.
>
> But those are mostly orthogonal to this series. The goal here is to get
> rid of the throttling mechanism as a cooling device.

Right, thanks

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |