Re: [PATCH RFCv1 05/14] iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VIOMMU and IOMMUFD_CMD_VIOMMU_ALLOC

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 05:13:50PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Yea. VMM is always allowed to create a viommu to wrap an S2
> HWPT. Then, I assume iommufd in this case should allocate a
> viommu object if !domain_ops->viommu_alloc.

Yeah

> On one side, it may not be straightforward for a qemu viommu
> driver to hold a shared S2 hwpt, as the driver is typically
> per instance, though I think it can keep viommu to its own.
> So passing the S2 hwpt back to qemu core and tie to iommufd
> handler (ictx) makes sense.

Yes, qemu will need some per-driver-type but not per-instance storage
to make this work. Ie the ARM per-driver-type shared storage would
hold the ARM specific list of S2 hwpts.

> On the other side, there can be some future HW potentially
> supporting two+ kinds of IO page tables so a VM may have two+
> S2 hwpts? Then the core would hold a list of S2 hwpts and the
> viommu driver would need to try-n-allocate viommu against the
> list..

Yes, it is supported in the API. Userspace should try to create
viommus with all the S2 hwpts available and build a new one if it
can't, just like hwpt attachment to a device.

Jason