From: "Sheetal ." <sheetal@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Mohan kumar <mkumard@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] regmap: Add KUnit test for flat_cache_default_is_zero
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:58:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112042841.51799-3-sheetal@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112042841.51799-1-sheetal@nvidia.com>
From: Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
Add KUnit test coverage for the flat_cache_default_is_zero flag. The
test verifies that when the flag is set:
- Writes in cache_only mode work before registers are marked valid
- Writes in cache_only mode work after registers are marked valid
- After regcache_mark_dirty() and regcache_sync(), cached values
are correctly written to hardware
- Reads return the cached values
Test command:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run regmap
Test results:
============= flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =============
[PASSED] flat-default @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default fast I/O @0x0
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2001
[PASSED] flat-default @0x2002
========= [PASSED] flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag =========
Signed-off-by: Sheetal <sheetal@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index f6fc5ed016da..7eec555c449c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_only_list[] = {
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(real_cache_types_only, real_cache_types_only_list, param_to_desc);
+static const struct regmap_test_param flat_cache_types_list[] = {
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2001 },
+ { .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0x2002 },
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(flat_cache_types, flat_cache_types_list, param_to_desc);
+
static const struct regmap_test_param real_cache_types_list[] = {
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0 },
{ .cache = REGCACHE_FLAT, .from_reg = 0, .fast_io = true },
@@ -1517,6 +1526,83 @@ static void cache_present(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, regcache_reg_cached(map, param->from_reg + i));
}
+/*
+ * Test flat_cache_default_is_zero flag behavior.
+ *
+ * When this flag is set on REGCACHE_FLAT, registers not in reg_defaults
+ * are treated as having a default value of zero. This allows drivers to
+ * avoid maintaining large reg_defaults arrays for hardware with zero
+ * power-on-reset values.
+ */
+static void flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+ config.flat_cache_default_is_zero = true;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(test, &config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ data->read[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+ }
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode before registers are marked valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x100));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ /* Verify reads return cached values */
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_read(map, param->from_reg + i, &val));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x100, val);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ data->written[param->from_reg + i] = false;
+
+ /* Write in cache_only mode after registers are already valid */
+ regcache_cache_only(map, true);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, param->from_reg + i, i + 0x200));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ regcache_cache_only(map, false);
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, data->written[param->from_reg + i]);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i + 0x200, data->vals[param->from_reg + i]);
+}
+
static void cache_write_zero(struct kunit *test)
{
const struct regmap_test_param *param = test->param_value;
@@ -2078,6 +2164,7 @@ static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_present, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_write_zero, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_range_window_reg, real_cache_types_only_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(flat_cache_default_is_zero_flag, flat_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults_single, raw_test_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults, raw_test_types_gen_params),
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 4:28 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] regmap: Add flat_cache_default_is_zero flag for flat cache Sheetal .
2026-01-12 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Sheetal .
2026-01-12 19:09 ` Sander Vanheule
2026-01-12 21:45 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-12 4:28 ` Sheetal . [this message]
2026-01-12 4:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: tegra: Enable flat_cache_default_is_zero for audio drivers Sheetal .
2026-01-12 12:26 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-12 12:53 ` Sheetal .
2026-01-12 13:32 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260112042841.51799-3-sheetal@nvidia.com \
--to=sheetal@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox