public inbox for linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <treding@nvidia.com>,
	<jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <bbasu@nvidia.com>, <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: CPPC: Check cpc_read() return values consistently
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:20:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318095005.2437960-1-sumitg@nvidia.com> (raw)

Callers of cpc_read() ignore its return value, which can lead
to using uninitialized or stale values when the read fails.

Fix this by consistently checking cpc_read() return values in
cppc_get_perf_caps(), cppc_get_perf_ctrs(), and cppc_get_perf().

Depends-on: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260206142658.72583-2-sumitg@nvidia.com/

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/48bdf87e-39f1-402f-a7dc-1a0e1e7a819d@nvidia.com/
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 5ad922eb937a..053fc6765a59 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -1394,45 +1394,66 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpc_read(cpunum, highest_reg, &high);
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, highest_reg, &high);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
 	perf_caps->highest_perf = high;
 
-	cpc_read(cpunum, lowest_reg, &low);
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, lowest_reg, &low);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
 	perf_caps->lowest_perf = low;
 
-	cpc_read(cpunum, nominal_reg, &nom);
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, nominal_reg, &nom);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
 	perf_caps->nominal_perf = nom;
 
 	/*
 	 * If reference perf register is not supported then we should
 	 * use the nominal perf value
 	 */
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(reference_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &ref);
-	else
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(reference_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &ref);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	} else {
 		ref = nom;
+	}
 	perf_caps->reference_perf = ref;
 
 	if (guaranteed_reg->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER  ||
 	    IS_NULL_REG(&guaranteed_reg->cpc_entry.reg)) {
 		perf_caps->guaranteed_perf = 0;
 	} else {
-		cpc_read(cpunum, guaranteed_reg, &guaranteed);
+		ret = cpc_read(cpunum, guaranteed_reg, &guaranteed);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
 		perf_caps->guaranteed_perf = guaranteed;
 	}
 
-	cpc_read(cpunum, lowest_non_linear_reg, &min_nonlinear);
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, lowest_non_linear_reg, &min_nonlinear);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
 	perf_caps->lowest_nonlinear_perf = min_nonlinear;
 
-	if (!high || !low || !nom || !ref || !min_nonlinear)
+	if (!high || !low || !nom || !ref || !min_nonlinear) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
+		goto out_err;
+	}
 
 	/* Read optional lowest and nominal frequencies if present */
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(low_freq_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpunum, low_freq_reg, &low_f);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(low_freq_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpunum, low_freq_reg, &low_f);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(nom_freq_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpunum, nom_freq_reg, &nom_f);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(nom_freq_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpunum, nom_freq_reg, &nom_f);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 
 	perf_caps->lowest_freq = low_f;
 	perf_caps->nominal_freq = nom_f;
@@ -1526,16 +1547,25 @@ int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs)
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpc_read(cpunum, delivered_reg, &delivered);
-	cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &reference);
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, delivered_reg, &delivered);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	ret = cpc_read(cpunum, reference_reg, &reference);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_err;
+
 	/*
 	 * Per spec, if ctr_wrap_time optional register is unsupported, then the
 	 * performance counters are assumed to never wrap during the lifetime of
 	 * platform
 	 */
 	ctr_wrap_time = (u64)(~((u64)0));
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(ctr_wrap_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpunum, ctr_wrap_reg, &ctr_wrap_time);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(ctr_wrap_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpunum, ctr_wrap_reg, &ctr_wrap_time);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 
 	if (!delivered || !reference) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
@@ -1811,24 +1841,39 @@ int cppc_get_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls)
 	}
 
 	/* Read optional elements if present */
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_perf_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpu, max_perf_reg, &max);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(max_perf_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpu, max_perf_reg, &max);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 	perf_ctrls->max_perf = max;
 
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_perf_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpu, min_perf_reg, &min);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(min_perf_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpu, min_perf_reg, &min);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 	perf_ctrls->min_perf = min;
 
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpu, desired_perf_reg, &desired_perf);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(desired_perf_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpu, desired_perf_reg, &desired_perf);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 	perf_ctrls->desired_perf = desired_perf;
 
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(energy_perf_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpu, energy_perf_reg, &energy_perf);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(energy_perf_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpu, energy_perf_reg, &energy_perf);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 	perf_ctrls->energy_perf = energy_perf;
 
-	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_reg))
-		cpc_read(cpu, auto_sel_reg, &auto_sel);
+	if (CPC_SUPPORTED(auto_sel_reg)) {
+		ret = cpc_read(cpu, auto_sel_reg, &auto_sel);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
 	perf_ctrls->auto_sel = (bool)auto_sel;
 
 out_err:
-- 
2.34.1


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260318095005.2437960-1-sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox