From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA5933C9EEE; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785357144; cv=none; b=JEoOqNA3QKNsUwXfq5XvZ2T7s6CF0x5M6hOTGu6dPiW3CS9JS2vDY6ANAvgBU3XiCtUGlVTeW30u1ZlZzXlRoovdFRNABhkfUuhsTN3XMar9erKvBho8YuOXcudaDjGO5F1Gidkcryg7j48bVNrz6j6Qm1jjQgZACXUHoXdOYRo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785357144; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F5IKq6tStFr/2514NCP6oWZPmmawnjIGz2XNjviaS2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E9CpBnZYdE6nkEwKc8VO/tQQqBO6NNYqy67CP0p18l4Dv1mzTwXZ4xyuxxTxFSbqcAsqLQwo2/iIVM7TV0nn7y/65Y6C7oj3GjJzOxxhGqGPxM/RsKvLrEMx7EPj6S+WtLjVDMl9IuWTWMuKxuYQ9WAXAXKL1b7blJaQ2s98cDQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=a8XJqTZ/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a8XJqTZ/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45AD41F000E9; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:32:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785357143; bh=o4LwrGMKdsyiGbYcgs69UzBmVusf0+mW1ZKjaz2vMXM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=a8XJqTZ/HQZ9S20Svo+TSeJ3O15hqPvyEAFQHqwuLVM7Y8GQCrC0lw7lylri6Hrm+ eO3howZapdbNEpYPTUqtykbCQOpvtlHC6hKftdD7GKmyGkGDIpeFQdW5rhtDEF3Ome Q8EQQGlQ2QNBXWomPXj2frAYA9rnqVY63aGo4SmN3Y/SLpJPfUtInugJvud/YiWo4L 2ZzmxH9HuTwCsAUp+a8+k2kh3kZNjIdmQg5zxniMfNZPLA3hmNmjPzU78PHneHJCIv u/PCq1faZh9hg55FcxFYK5a2Fx0EytjGDX7R7ceowr/k0ysoFFOtysWufr5GkxhSyp 3KbDmgbdu8MOw== Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:32:21 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Karthikeyan Mitran , Hou Zhiqiang , Thomas Petazzoni , Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= , Michal Simek , Kevin Xie , Aksh Garg , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/6] PCI: Use standard wait times for PCIe link monitoring Message-ID: <20260729203221.GA1465128@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260716-tegra264-pcie-v8-3-23e51589229b@nvidia.com> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 07:07:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > Instead of defining the wait values for each driver, use common values > defined in the core pci.h header file. Note that while most drivers use > the usleep_range(), it looks like these were mostly cargo culted and > msleep() is a better choice given the fixed delay that the specification > calls for. Convert all drivers to msleep() and use the existing > definition. Thanks for doing this, removing all this needless duplication is great!