From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Courbot Subject: Re: Power sequences upstreaming (Was: Re: [PATCH] tegra: ventana: display and backlight DT entries) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:09:10 +0900 Message-ID: <2322802.yJhDIQtgoO@percival> References: <1352802204-1740-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <193309413.vmBPZntXg4@percival> <20121115060310.GA26076@lizard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121115060310.GA26076@lizard> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mark Zhang , David Woodhouse List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 November 2012 14:03:10 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 02:45:44PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > Anton, David, would you agree to pull power sequences support from my tree > > (considering I will maintain it)? It will reside in > > drivers/power/power_seq and as it is not a major feature it might not be > > worth dealing with Linus directly. > > > > The feature has gone through 5 review cycles, received some Acks and is > > being used by the pwm-backlight driver and very probably others in the > > future (I am particularly thinking about the panel framework which is > > likely to need them). We would like to push Tegra display support in 3.8, > > and this feature will be needed to support our reference boards. Please > > let me know if you would be the right intermediate or if I should ask > > someone else. > > Sure, I can easily pull your tree (assuming you guys agree on the > subsystem design, i.e. if the code has no strong NAKs). Excellent, thanks - when would you need the code in order to be on time for 3.8? Alex.