From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Revanth Kumar Uppala <ruppala@nvidia.com>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: phy: aquantia: Poll for TX ready at PHY system side
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:36:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2aefce6d-5009-491b-b797-ca318e8bad4e@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqdzOxYJiRyft1Nh@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 29/07/2024 11:47, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
...
>> Apologies for not following up before on this and now that is has been a
>> year I am not sure if it is even appropriate to dig this up as opposed to
>> starting a new thread completely.
>>
>> However, I want to resume this conversation because we have found that this
>> change does resolve a long-standing issue where we occasionally see our
>> ethernet controller fail to get an IP address.
>>
>> I understand that your objection to the above change is that (per Revanth's
>> feedback) this change assumes interface has the link. However, looking at
>> the aqr107_read_status() function where this change is made the function has
>> the following ...
>>
>> static int aqr107_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> {
>> int val, ret;
>>
>> ret = aqr_read_status(phydev);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> if (!phydev->link || phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_DISABLE)
>> return 0;
>>
>>
>> So my understanding is that if we don't have the link, then the above test
>> will return before we attempt to poll the TX ready status. If that is the
>> case, then would the change being proposed be OK?
>
> Here, phydev->link will be the _media_ side link. This is fine - if the
> media link is down, there's no point doing anything further. However,
> if the link is up, then we need the PHY to update phydev->interface
> _and_ report that the link was up (phydev->link is true).
>
> When that happens, the layers above (e.g. phylib, phylink, MAC driver)
> then know that the _media_ side interface has come up, and they also
> know the parameters that were negotiated. They also know what interface
> mode the PHY is wanting to use.
>
> At that point, the MAC driver can then reconfigure its PHY facing
> interface according to what the PHY is using. Until that point, there
> is a very real chance that the PHY <--> MAC connection will remain
> _down_.
>
> The patch adds up to a _two_ _second_ wait for the PHY <--> MAC
> connection to come up before aqr107_read_status() will return. This
> is total nonsense - because waiting here means that the MAC won't
> get the notification of which interface mode the PHY is expecting
> to use, therefore the MAC won't configure its PHY facing hardware
> for that interface mode, and therefore the PHY <--> MAC connection
> will _not_ _come_ _up_.
>
> You can not wait for the PHY <--> MAC connection to come up in the
> phylib read_status method. Ever.
>
> This is non-negotiable because it is just totally wrong to do this
> and leads to pointless two second delays.
Thanks for the feedback! We will go away, review this and see if we can
figure out a good/correct way to resolve our ethernet issue.
Jon
--
nvpublic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-28 12:43 [PATCH 1/4] net: phy: aquantia: Enable Tx/Rx pause frame support in aquantia PHY Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-06-28 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: phy: aquantia: Enable MAC Controlled EEE Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-06-28 13:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-24 11:29 ` Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-07-24 11:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-06-28 12:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: phy: aquantia: Poll for TX ready at PHY system side Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-06-28 13:33 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-07-24 11:29 ` Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-07-24 11:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-19 13:27 ` Jon Hunter
2024-07-29 10:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-30 9:36 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2024-07-30 9:41 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-30 10:02 ` Jon Hunter
2024-07-30 11:12 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-30 12:25 ` Jon Hunter
2024-09-24 10:33 ` Jon Hunter
2023-06-28 12:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: phy: aqr113c: Enable Wake-on-LAN (WOL) Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-06-28 13:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-07-24 11:29 ` Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-07-24 12:29 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-06-28 14:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-24 11:30 ` Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-06-28 18:57 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-28 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: phy: aquantia: Enable Tx/Rx pause frame support in aquantia PHY Russell King (Oracle)
2023-06-28 13:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-07-24 11:29 ` Revanth Kumar Uppala
2023-07-24 11:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-06-28 13:46 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2aefce6d-5009-491b-b797-ca318e8bad4e@nvidia.com \
--to=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruppala@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).