From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:53:25 +0900 Message-ID: <3370354.JQqCLmZLM6@percival> References: <1347443867-18868-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <5050FE28.2080502@wwwdotorg.org> <20120912213355.GA3342@lizard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120912213355.GA3342@lizard> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: Stephen Warren , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Simon Glass , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Mark Brown , David Woodhouse , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Leela Krishna Amudala , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 September 2012 05:33:56 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:27:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > > > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that > > > was > > > kindly provided about the last version. > > > > > > I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start > > > looking for a maintainer who would be willing to merge this into > > > his/her tree (I am especially thinking about the power framework > > > maintainers, since this is where the code is right now. > > > > > > The other alternative is for you to maintain this going forward; I > > believe that would be as simple as: > > > > * Create a patch to add yourself to MAINTAINERS for the > > drivers/power/power_seq/ directory. > > > > * Get a kernel.org account, push this patch to a branch there, and add > > the branch into linux-next. > > > > * Send a pull request to Linus at the appropriate time. > > > > * Ongoing: Accept any patches, perform any maintenance required, etc. > > > > Does anyone see any issue with Alexandre doing this? Nobody else has > > volunteered yet:-) > > > Yup, looks like the best way. I am fine this way too - it will just take some time for me to get ready as I will need to get my GPG key signed by some kernel developers first (that's what I forgot to do during the last LinuxCon!). I know a few here so it should not be too hard to get them drunk and sign my key, but I don't expect to be ready for the 3.7 merge window. Would anybody be concerned by this delay? By the meantime I can also make a branch available somewhere. Alex.