From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Ni Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] thermal: tegra: remove unnecessary warnings Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:52:42 +0800 Message-ID: <380eb5fc-ed94-db87-9118-2fa8133d9c78@nvidia.com> References: <1543486183-2868-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <1543486183-2868-2-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <20181129163938.GA2045@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181129163938.GA2045@localhost.localdomain> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eduardo Valentin Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, srikars@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 30/11/2018 12:39 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:09:41PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote: >> Convert warnings to info as not all platforms may >> have all the thresholds and sensors enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni >> --- >> drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c >> index ed28110a3535..55cc1f2f6a45 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c >> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev, >> >> ret = tz->ops->get_crit_temp(tz, &temperature); >> if (ret) { >> - dev_warn(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n", >> + dev_info(dev, "thermtrip: %s: missing critical temperature\n", > > I am mostly ok with your change in direction. But are you sure this is a > good thing? What about in the case that you have a platform that have > the crit temp and you really failed to .get_crit_temp()? If we set the crit temp in DT, but failed to .get_crit_temp(), it mean the thermal framework have some problems. Since the critical trip is very important, may be we should still keep "dev_warn" in here? > >> sg->name); >> goto set_throttle; >> } >> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev, >> set_throttle: >> ret = get_hot_temp(tz, &trip, &temperature); >> if (ret) { >> - dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n", >> + dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing hot temperature\n", >> sg->name); >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int tegra_soctherm_set_hwtrips(struct device *dev, >> } >> >> if (i == THROTTLE_SIZE) >> - dev_warn(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n", >> + dev_info(dev, "throttrip: %s: missing throttle cdev\n", >> sg->name); >> >> return 0; >> -- >> 2.7.4 >>