From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: tegra: check BPMP response return code Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:21:24 +0100 Message-ID: <388e07bc-b7b4-cc17-026a-bd08d77942ca@nvidia.com> References: <6a69e270519fd1c7a12a335053bf59671abc3c4b.1504776489.git.talho@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6a69e270519fd1c7a12a335053bf59671abc3c4b.1504776489.git.talho@nvidia.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Alho , thierry.reding@gmail.com Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/17 10:31, Timo Alho wrote: > Check return code in BPMP response message(s). The typical error case > is when clock operation is attempted with invalid clock identifier. > > Also remove error print from call to clk_get_info() as the > implementation loops through range of all possible identifier, but the > operation is expected error out when the clock id is unused. > > Signed-off-by: Timo Alho > --- > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c > index 638ace6..a896692 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-bpmp.c > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct tegra_bpmp_clk_message { > struct { > void *data; > size_t size; > + int ret; > } rx; > }; > > @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_clk_transfer(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp, > struct mrq_clk_request request; > struct tegra_bpmp_message msg; > void *req = &request; > + int err; > > memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request)); > request.cmd_and_id = (clk->cmd << 24) | clk->id; > @@ -84,7 +86,13 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_clk_transfer(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp, > msg.rx.data = clk->rx.data; > msg.rx.size = clk->rx.size; > > - return tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg); > + err = tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + else if (msg.rx.ret < 0) > + return -EINVAL; I assume that the error codes returned do not correlated to the Linux error codes here. Is that correct? If not we could just return the actual error code. Otherwise would it be useful to print a message with the bpmp error code for debug? > + > + return 0; > } > > static int tegra_bpmp_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw) > @@ -414,11 +422,8 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_probe_clocks(struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp, > struct tegra_bpmp_clk_info *info = &clocks[count]; > > err = tegra_bpmp_clk_get_info(bpmp, id, info); > - if (err < 0) { > - dev_err(bpmp->dev, "failed to query clock %u: %d\n", > - id, err); > + if (err < 0) > continue; > - } > > if (info->num_parents >= U8_MAX) { > dev_err(bpmp->dev, > Cheers Jon -- nvpublic