Re: How to represent active low ARM GIC interrupts, enabled by external inverter?

[Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

On 01/23/2012 04:33 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:18:50PM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> I'd like guidance on how to model one aspect of Tegra's interrupt
>> structure.
>>
>> Tegra has an interrupt input pin for use by a PMU chip.
>>
>> The PMC HW module within Tegra can optionally invert this signal, but
>> otherwise has no control over it; no interrupt status bits, no masking,
>> etc.
>>
>> The (potentially inverted) signal is then fed into the ARM GIC, which
>> supports level high or rising edge interrupts only.

Stephen, isn't this the same question you posted before except where the
inverter is is different?

http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2011-December/009880.html

> 
> When I originally added the IRQ trigger types to request_irq(), the
> original intention was for these to be specified by the requesting
> driver according to what the chip required, and there to be some kind
> of hook to deal with the inversion which happens on some boards.
> 
> However, that was never implemented because there was a far better
> solution: pass this information to the driver via the device resource
> structures, which already have this information defined for PNP
> devices.  The driver would then find the IRQ resource which would
> tell it both the number and the IRQ trigger flags to be used.
> 
> Some drivers have done this, to cope with differing wiring on boards.
> I don't know if DT supports this though, but I'd suggest that it's
> a solution worth investigating.
> 

As my suggestion was the same approach as Russell's.

Rob