From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] regmap: Support for caching in reg_raw_write() Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:37:34 +0530 Message-ID: <4F350886.4070600@nvidia.com> References: <1328873572-12603-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <4F350716.9050407@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F350716.9050407-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: "broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org" , "gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Friday 10 February 2012 05:31 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 02/10/2012 12:32 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> Adding support for caching of data into the >> non-volatile register from the call of reg_raw_write(). >> >> This will allow the larger block of data write into multiple >> register without worrying whether register is cached or not >> through reg_raw_write(). >> > In my opinion it makes more sense to introduce a regmap_bulk_write function > for this. Yes, I am going to push another change which will have the regmap_bulk_write() which will be in sync with read part.