From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] ARM: dt: tegra30.dtsi: Add audio-related nodes Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:28:19 -0600 Message-ID: <4F851673.6030000@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1334099980-19527-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1334099980-19527-4-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Colin Cross , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 04/10/2012 10:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: ... > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> Add nodes for the Tegra30 AHUB and I2S controllers. ... >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi ... >> + ahub@70080000 { > > No need for unit address here since there's only one node with this > name -- "ahub {" is sufficient. Is there actually a benefit from leaving it out though? >> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-ahub"; >> + reg = <0x70080000 0x200 0x70080200 0x100>; > > Why not just use 0x70080000 0x300? The register space is logically divided into two chunks; the first for the DMA FIFOs and the second for the AHUB routing registers. Future chips may change the relative positions and sizes of these two chunks, hence I figured it was best to model them independently even though they're contiguous in Tegra30.