[PATCH] ARM: disable SUSPEND/ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE for ARCH_TEGRA

[PATCH] ARM: disable SUSPEND/ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE for ARCH_TEGRA

[Stephen Warren]

From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Tegra doesn't yet support system sleep. Explicitly disable support
for this feature in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
Russell, I assume this should go into the ARM patch tracker?

 arch/arm/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 4f4fead..5bc48d2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -2243,7 +2243,7 @@ menu "Power management options"
 source "kernel/power/Kconfig"
 
 config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
-	depends on !ARCH_S5PC100
+	depends on !ARCH_S5PC100 && !ARCH_TEGRA
 	depends on CPU_ARM920T || CPU_ARM926T || CPU_SA1100 || \
 		CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_XSCALE
 	def_bool y
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH] ARM: disable SUSPEND/ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE for ARCH_TEGRA

[Stephen Warren]

On 04/25/2012 01:20 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Tegra doesn't yet support system sleep. Explicitly disable support
> for this feature in Kconfig.

Russell, Arnd, Olof, should this go through the ARM patch tracker, or
should I just take it through the Tegra tree? Thanks.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig

>  config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
> -	depends on !ARCH_S5PC100
> +	depends on !ARCH_S5PC100 && !ARCH_TEGRA
>  	depends on CPU_ARM920T || CPU_ARM926T || CPU_SA1100 || \
>  		CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_XSCALE
>  	def_bool y

Re: [PATCH] ARM: disable SUSPEND/ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE for ARCH_TEGRA

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 05:20:46PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 01:20 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Tegra doesn't yet support system sleep. Explicitly disable support
> > for this feature in Kconfig.
> 
> Russell, Arnd, Olof, should this go through the ARM patch tracker, or
> should I just take it through the Tegra tree? Thanks.

I don't think it really matters - this doesn't change a lot so the
chances of conflicts are relatively low.