From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [v2 1/1] ARM: dt: tegra{20,30}.dtsi: Rename "MC" to "Memory Controller" Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:20:40 -0600 Message-ID: <4FB3E1E8.1050408@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1337151226-7266-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com><1337172241-28677-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com><4FB3CC87.4030505@wwwdotorg.org> <20120516.201540.1972877673672045065.hdoyu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120516.201540.1972877673672045065.hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hiroshi Doyu Cc: "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2012 11:15 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Stephen Warren wrote @ Wed, 16 May 2012 17:49:27 +0200: > >> On 05/16/2012 06:44 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: >>> Use a more plain english name. >> >> It's probably too late taking this cosmetic change for 3.5. >> >> There is also an "emc" node that probably should be renamed to >> memory-controller too. In that case, since there will be two >> memory-controller nodes, you'll need to add the unit address >> ("@xxxxxxxx") back on the end of both the node names. >> >> Can I get a patch series that does all that and updates the binding >> documentation for both MC and EMC? Probably separate patches for MC and EMC. > > Sure. How should we deal with "emc" for emc-table in seaboard? > arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:337: emc { > arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-seaboard.dts:338: emc-table@190000 { I'd be inclined to leave that as-is. Olof, any objections? By the way, be sure to base your patch on the very latest Tegra tree or linux-next; I did a lot of .dts cleanup in the last couple days. Thanks.