From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antti Palosaari Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver-core: Shut up dev_dbg_reatelimited() without DEBUG Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:11:56 +0300 Message-ID: <502EDDCC.200@iki.fi> References: <20120817.090416.563933713934615530.hdoyu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120817.090416.563933713934615530.hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hiroshi Doyu Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "htl10-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org" , "linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 08/17/2012 09:04 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > dev_dbg_reatelimited() without DEBUG printed "217078 callbacks > suppressed". This shouldn't print anything without DEBUG. > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu > Reported-by: Antti Palosaari > --- > include/linux/device.h | 6 +++++- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > index eb945e1..d4dc26e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/device.h > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > @@ -962,9 +962,13 @@ do { \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_notice, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > #define dev_info_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_info, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#if defined(DEBUG) > #define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_dbg, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > - > +#else > +#define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > + no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#endif > /* > * Stupid hackaround for existing uses of non-printk uses dev_info > * > NACK. I don't think that's correct behavior. After that patch it kills all output of dev_dbg_ratelimited(). If I use dynamic debugs and order debugs, I expect to see debugs as earlier. I did test module in order to demonstrate problem. Here it is: http://git.linuxtv.org/anttip/media_tree.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dev_dbg_ratelimited There is also file named: test_results.txt It contains 4 test cases: 1) without that patch & without module dynamic debug 2) without that patch & module dynamic debug ordered 3) with that patch & without module dynamic debug 4) with that patch & module dynamic debug ordered regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/