From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: phy: re-organize tegra phy driver Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:36:44 -0600 Message-ID: <505162DC.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1347447481-25574-1-git-send-email-vbyravarasu@nvidia.com> <5050D622.7080704@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Venu Byravarasu Cc: "balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 09/12/2012 09:49 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > Stephen Warren wrote at Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:06 AM: >> On 09/12/2012 04:58 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: >>> Nvidia produces several Tegra SOCs viz Tegra2, Tegra3 etc. >>> In order to support USB phy drivers on these SOCs, existing >>> phy driver is split into SOC agnostic common USB phy driver and >>> tegra2 specific USB phy driver. >>> This will facilitate easy addition & deletion of phy drivers for >>> Tegra SOCs. >> >> For capitalization/related reasons, I would re-write the commit >> description as: >> >> NVIDIA produces several Tegra SoCs viz Tegra20, Tegra30 etc. >> In order to support USB PHY drivers on these SoCs, existing > > Will change tegra2 to Tegra20 and similar for Tegra30 & NVIDIA. > However as phy is not an acronym, should we still have it in Caps? I'd certainly expect to see PHY in all-caps, yes. As entirely arbitrary justification, see the precedent at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHY_(chip) Sorry for bike-shedding, but I'm picky about that kind of thing, at least sometimes.