From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: tegra: move to of_clk_get Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 15:09:57 -0700 Message-ID: <511031B5.4010900@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1359985230-11506-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Peter De Schrijver Cc: Russell King , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 02/04/2013 06:40 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > The new clockframework introduced DT IDs for each clock. To be able to remove > the device registrations, this driver needs to be updated to use the DT IDs. > Note that the actual removal of the clk_register_clkdev() calls will be done > in a later series. This seems fine for 3.10, but I wonder about dependencies. Will there be a bunch of other similar changes? I guess this patch is a dependency of some changes to drivers/clk/tegra/ to remove the non-DT clock registrations? It'd be good to get a clear idea of all the dependencies, so we can see what's the best tree to apply the changes to; perhaps this should go through the drivers/clk tree, or Tegra's clk driver changes need to go through the Tegra tree again in 3.10?