Re: [PATCH V3] pinctrl: tegra: add suspend/resume support

[Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

07.11.2012 01:45, Stephen Warren пишет:
> On 11/06/2012 01:06 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 06.11.2012 21:38, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> OK, so only you and he have the binaries built from this repository? Or,
>>> are those binaries distributed to other people too? If the binaries are
>>> distributed, you need to distribute (or offer to make available) the
>>> source too. See the GPL for exact requirements.
>>
>> I'm not against GPL, but for now repo is private. It's something like nvidia's
>> private downstream kernel that I'm working on. Surely it will become public but
>> bit later.
>>
>>> OK, so if I accept the private repo link, download the source, and
>>> repost it on my github account, you're fine with that? If not, then
>>> you're requesting something semantically equivalent to an NDA.
>>
>> For me it's not very important, but my companion may be unhappy with that. I
>> just believe that you are not so evil. As I understand NDA should be some
>> legally valid official document. I'm sure you are much better in this than me,
>> so let's stop discussing it.
>>
>>> However, I'd ask that we resolve the distribution issues of the source
>>> kernel first to avoid any tainting of the patch.
>>
>> I don't see any issues. It's my personal work that I'm contributing to the
>> kernel community. If nvidia is against of any public contributions just tell me.
> 
> NVIDIA and indeed the kernel community welcome public contributions.
> 
> However, the rules in SubmittingPatches (as set by the kernel community,
> not NVIDIA) are clear re: the licensing requirements for patches. If
> you're taking the patches from a downstream kernel that's published as
> binaries and not source, I believe that makes the patches non-compliant
> (since there's a GPL violation in the downstream kernel, so the patches
> can't be passed off as being GPL compliant), and hence your
> signed-off-by line is not valid.
> 
> Once the downstream kernel's source is publicly available, I imagine
> there will be no problem accepting patches that are derived from it.
> 

Hello, Stephen. I made my recent work on kernel public and it's available
at https://bitbucket.org/digetx/picasso-kernel/ It contains all patches that
I have sent and has some small fixes that I will send later. Hope there is no
problem anymore and you would like to continue reviewing my patches.