From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-tegra: cleanup ifdefs Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:09:16 -0700 Message-ID: <5137B07C.1040700@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1361385317-6020-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> <1361385317-6020-4-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1361385317-6020-4-git-send-email-rklein-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rhyland Klein , Chris Ball Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pritesh Raithatha List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: > The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having > them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs > also makes the code a little cleaner. Chris, I think patches 3 and 4 of this series can go through either the MMC tree (I checked there are no conflicts with the MMC patch I have to take through the Tegra tree), or the Tegra tree (since I'm taking another Tegra MMC patch though there), both without any dependency issues. It's your call. Let me know if you want me to take them through the Tegra tree with an ack. Or, if you want to take them through the MMC tree that's fine too. If you need them reposted to see the content, let me know, or they're at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222136/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222138/ Thanks.