From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-tegra: cleanup ifdefs Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:17:47 -0700 Message-ID: <5137CE9B.3070203@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1361385317-6020-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> <1361385317-6020-4-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> <5137B07C.1040700@wwwdotorg.org> <87r4js16ml.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87r4js16ml.fsf-DGHOrqG7t0YzNDMTQreKSUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Chris Ball Cc: Rhyland Klein , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pritesh Raithatha List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 06 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >>> The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having >>> them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs >>> also makes the code a little cleaner. >> >> I think patches 3 and 4 of this series can go through either the MMC >> tree (I checked there are no conflicts with the MMC patch I have to take >> through the Tegra tree), or the Tegra tree (since I'm taking another >> Tegra MMC patch though there), both without any dependency issues. >> >> It's your call. Let me know if you want me to take them through the >> Tegra tree with an ack. Or, if you want to take them through the MMC >> tree that's fine too. If you need them reposted to see the content, let >> me know, or they're at: > > Via the MMC tree with an ack sounds good OK, thanks. Patches 3/4 and 4/4, Acked-by: Stephen Warren