From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: tegra: moving the CPU power timer function to PMC driver Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:40:06 -0600 Message-ID: <5140B9F6.3060604@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1363163246-26368-1-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1363163246-26368-1-git-send-email-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joseph Lo Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2013 02:27 AM, Joseph Lo wrote: > The CPU power timer set up fucntion was related to PMC register. Now moving > it to PMC driver. And it also help to clean up the PM related code later. > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo > --- > This series was based on the patch set of suspending support. So the series is based on the suspend series in terms of patch context, but does it actually /depend/ on that series? This series feels like cleanup to me, so I'd be tempted to apply it to Tegra's for-3.10/cleanup branch, whereas I was planning on applying the suspend series to its own for-3.10/suspend topic branch. If that won't work, I guess I can apply this series on top of the suspend series in the suspend topic branch.