From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ARM: tegra: update device trees for USB binding rework Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:16:52 -0600 Message-ID: <515C8024.30204@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1364978502-22887-1-git-send-email-vbyravarasu@nvidia.com> <1364978502-22887-3-git-send-email-vbyravarasu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1364978502-22887-3-git-send-email-vbyravarasu@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Venu Byravarasu Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, balbi@ti.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 04/03/2013 02:41 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: > This patch updates all Tegra board files so that they contain all the > properties required by the updated USB DT binding. Note that this patch > only adds the new properties and does not yet remove the old properties, > in order to maintain bisectability. The old properties will be removed > once the driver has been updated to assume the new bindings. The binding documentation says that the vbus-supply property is required in all cases. However, many of the DT files still don't have that property even after this patch. That's inconsistent. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-iris-512.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-iris-512.dts > index 52f1103..c99eccc 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-iris-512.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-iris-512.dts > @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ > dr_mode = "otg"; > }; > > + usb-phy@c5000000 { > + dr_mode = "otg"; > + }; Since this port claims to be OTG-capable, presumably a vbus-supply property is mandatory here? If you don't know enough about the board to correctly set up such a regulator, lets just mark this port as host-only for now; we can switch it back to OTG-mode later once someone implements the required regulator. This won't lose any functionality, since we don't support OTG-mode yet anyway. However, it will allow the device tree to be correct/consistent in the mean time. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-seaboard.dts > + usb-phy@c5000000 { > + vbus-supply = <&vbus_reg>; > + dr_mode = "otg"; > + }; Where is the nvidia,vbus-gpio property? Since your code changes don't actually implement use of the vbus-supply property yet, they will expect the vbus-gpio property to exist in the PHY node. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts > index 955bf49..8f2bb9b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-trimslice.dts > @@ -305,17 +305,21 @@ > nvidia,vbus-gpio = <&gpio 170 0>; /* gpio PV2 */ > }; > > + usb-phy@c5000000 { > + vbus-supply = <&vbus_reg>; > + }; Same here; isn't nvidia,vbus-gpio needed in the PHY node until the driver is converted to use vbus-supply? I guess this is a case of a host-only port where there is SW-control over VBUS...