From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rhyland Klein Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Add charger subnode to tps65090 node Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:24:23 -0400 Message-ID: <519A4027.2020801@nvidia.com> References: <1365623505-6309-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> <5196C3F2.8070204@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5196C3F2.8070204@wwwdotorg.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Stephen Warren , Laxman Dewangan Cc: "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 5/17/2013 7:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 04/10/2013 01:51 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >> The charger is now represented by a distinct subnode of the tps65090 >> device. Add this node and enable low current charging with it. > > What's the status of the TPS60590 bindings; are they agreed upon by > NVIDIA, TI, and SlimLogic yet? In other words, is this patch still > something I should apply for 3.11, or does it need to be reworked? I haven't seen any discussion with slimlogic or TI about the tps65090. As far as I know the bindings for this driver haven't changed. Laxman, do you think the work on the palmas driver will impact the design of the bindings for the tps65090? -rhyland > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- nvpublic