* [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig @ 2013-05-28 17:26 Stephen Warren 2013-05-28 21:30 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-05-28 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, it should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: AUTO_ZRELADDR: Selected by ARM multi-platform support. MTD_CHAR: Removed in Kconfig. This should make it easier to create future defconfig patches on top of linux-next, since all the extraneous diffs have been removed. It also makes it more likely that once 3.12 comes around, this defconfig will already match what's required there. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> --- arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig index 4dbcd9f..e45fe32 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD=y CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y # CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE is not set # CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ is not set -CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X=y +CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC=y @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM_TEXT=0x0 CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM_BSS=0x0 CONFIG_KEXEC=y -CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y @@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y # CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_MTD=y -CONFIG_MTD_CHAR=y CONFIG_MTD_M25P80=y CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y @@ -105,8 +103,8 @@ CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m CONFIG_RT2X00=y CONFIG_RT2800USB=m CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV=y -CONFIG_KEYBOARD_TEGRA=y CONFIG_KEYBOARD_GPIO=y +CONFIG_KEYBOARD_TEGRA=y CONFIG_INPUT_MISC=y CONFIG_INPUT_MPU3050=y # CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS is not set @@ -134,11 +132,11 @@ CONFIG_CHARGER_TPS65090=y CONFIG_POWER_RESET=y CONFIG_POWER_RESET_GPIO=y CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=y -CONFIG_MFD_TPS6586X=y -CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910=y CONFIG_MFD_MAX8907=y -CONFIG_MFD_TPS65090=y CONFIG_MFD_PALMAS=y +CONFIG_MFD_TPS65090=y +CONFIG_MFD_TPS6586X=y +CONFIG_MFD_TPS65910=y CONFIG_REGULATOR=y CONFIG_REGULATOR_FIXED_VOLTAGE=y CONFIG_REGULATOR_VIRTUAL_CONSUMER=y @@ -211,7 +209,6 @@ CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA=y CONFIG_STAGING=y CONFIG_SENSORS_ISL29018=y CONFIG_SENSORS_ISL29028=y -CONFIG_AK8975=y CONFIG_MFD_NVEC=y CONFIG_KEYBOARD_NVEC=y CONFIG_SERIO_NVEC_PS2=y @@ -221,6 +218,7 @@ CONFIG_TEGRA_IOMMU_GART=y CONFIG_TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU=y CONFIG_MEMORY=y CONFIG_IIO=y +CONFIG_AK8975=y CONFIG_PWM=y CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y -- 1.7.10.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig 2013-05-28 17:26 [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig Stephen Warren @ 2013-05-28 21:30 ` Stephen Warren [not found] ` <51A521F5.2010206-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-05-28 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren; +Cc: linux-tegra, Stephen Warren, linux-arm-kernel On 05/28/2013 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > > This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, it > should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig > ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: > > AUTO_ZRELADDR: Selected by ARM multi-platform support. > MTD_CHAR: Removed in Kconfig. > > This should make it easier to create future defconfig patches on top of > linux-next, since all the extraneous diffs have been removed. It also > makes it more likely that once 3.12 comes around, this defconfig will > already match what's required there. I've applied this (squashed it into) Tegra's for-3.11/defconfig branch. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <51A521F5.2010206-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig [not found] ` <51A521F5.2010206-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2013-05-29 13:38 ` Marc Dietrich [not found] ` <2234363.J239kID5LN-D3pzGp0ZKuDWZbiwp4sFPyrtisivX6KghOMvlBiLbJSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marc Dietrich @ 2013-05-29 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013, 15:30:29 schrieb Stephen Warren: > On 05/28/2013 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > > > > This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, it > > should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig > > ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: > > > > AUTO_ZRELADDR: Selected by ARM multi-platform support. > > MTD_CHAR: Removed in Kconfig. > > > > This should make it easier to create future defconfig patches on top of > > linux-next, since all the extraneous diffs have been removed. It also > > makes it more likely that once 3.12 comes around, this defconfig will > > already match what's required there. > > I've applied this (squashed it into) Tegra's for-3.11/defconfig branch. wouldn't it make more sense to apply such a patch just before the merge window closes (or better after some release candidate)? This way we would have a better chance to have a zero diff between defconfig and tegra_defconfig, e.g. not like 3.10 is now. Marc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2234363.J239kID5LN-D3pzGp0ZKuDWZbiwp4sFPyrtisivX6KghOMvlBiLbJSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig [not found] ` <2234363.J239kID5LN-D3pzGp0ZKuDWZbiwp4sFPyrtisivX6KghOMvlBiLbJSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> @ 2013-05-29 15:29 ` Stephen Warren [not found] ` <51A61EEC.5040300-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-05-29 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Dietrich Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren On 05/29/2013 07:38 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013, 15:30:29 schrieb Stephen Warren: >> On 05/28/2013 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >>> >>> This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, it >>> should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig >>> ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: >>> >>> AUTO_ZRELADDR: Selected by ARM multi-platform support. >>> MTD_CHAR: Removed in Kconfig. >>> >>> This should make it easier to create future defconfig patches on top of >>> linux-next, since all the extraneous diffs have been removed. It also >>> makes it more likely that once 3.12 comes around, this defconfig will >>> already match what's required there. >> >> I've applied this (squashed it into) Tegra's for-3.11/defconfig branch. > > wouldn't it make more sense to apply such a patch just before the merge window > closes (or better after some release candidate)? Perhaps. It probably also depends a lot on when Kconfig changes get applied in other areas as far as when it makes sense. I deferred it this time around in order to pick up some tegra_defconfig changes that made it into 3.10-rc3. > This way we would have a > better chance to have a zero diff between defconfig and tegra_defconfig, e.g. > not like 3.10 is now. I don't understand this; what is "defconfig" if not "tegra_defconfig"? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <51A61EEC.5040300-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig [not found] ` <51A61EEC.5040300-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2013-05-29 17:30 ` Marc Dietrich 2013-05-29 17:42 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marc Dietrich @ 2013-05-29 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren On Wednesday 29 May 2013 09:29:48 Stephen Warren wrote: > On 05/29/2013 07:38 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013, 15:30:29 schrieb Stephen Warren: > >> On 05/28/2013 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> > >>> > >>> This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, > >>> it > >>> should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig > >>> ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: > >>> > >>> AUTO_ZRELADDR: Selected by ARM multi-platform support. > >>> MTD_CHAR: Removed in Kconfig. > >>> > >>> This should make it easier to create future defconfig patches on top of > >>> linux-next, since all the extraneous diffs have been removed. It also > >>> makes it more likely that once 3.12 comes around, this defconfig will > >>> already match what's required there. > >> > >> I've applied this (squashed it into) Tegra's for-3.11/defconfig branch. > > > > wouldn't it make more sense to apply such a patch just before the merge > > window closes (or better after some release candidate)? > > Perhaps. It probably also depends a lot on when Kconfig changes get > applied in other areas as far as when it makes sense. I deferred it this > time around in order to pick up some tegra_defconfig changes that made > it into 3.10-rc3. ok, nice. > > This way we would have a > > better chance to have a zero diff between defconfig and tegra_defconfig, > > e.g. not like 3.10 is now. > > I don't understand this; what is "defconfig" if not "tegra_defconfig"? defconfig: make tegra_defconfig; make saveconfig diff -u tegra_defconfig defconfig Marc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig 2013-05-29 17:30 ` Marc Dietrich @ 2013-05-29 17:42 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-05-29 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Dietrich Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren On 05/29/2013 11:30 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote: > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 09:29:48 Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/29/2013 07:38 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013, 15:30:29 schrieb Stephen Warren: >>>> On 05/28/2013 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> >>>>> >>>>> This simply rebuilds tegra_defconfig on top of next-20130520. As such, >>>>> it >>>>> should introduce no changes; simply moving entries around due to Kconfig >>>>> ordering changes. The apparent exceptions are: ... >>> This way we would have a >>> better chance to have a zero diff between defconfig and tegra_defconfig, >>> e.g. not like 3.10 is now. >> >> I don't understand this; what is "defconfig" if not "tegra_defconfig"? > > defconfig: make tegra_defconfig; make saveconfig > > diff -u tegra_defconfig defconfig Oh right. Yes, if you do that in the for-3.11/defconfig branch itself, there will be diffs. That will always be true; that branch won't have any of the new drivers/features that will be added in linux-next and the next mainline kernel, so at the very least you'd end up removing some options doing that. I expect most people editing defconfig will be doing it based on some linux-next version rather than right on top of for-3.11/defconfig, so they can pick up, enable, and test new drivers or features. If you run the commands above in next-20130529, there should be a zero diff (unless someone made some Kconfig changes between next-20130528 and next-20130529 anyway). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig @ 2014-06-16 18:04 Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-06-16 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren, Thierry Reding Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Stephen Warren From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Run "make tegra_defconfig; make savedefconf" on v3.16-rc1. This allows other people to do the same thing to adjust the defconfig file without their patch bringing in a bunch of irrelevant diffs. All of the removed options either have been removed from Kconfig, or are now default y. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> --- I intend to apply this immediately to Tegra's for-3.17/defconfig branch. arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig index fb25e2982f64..157a4f144479 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig @@ -23,14 +23,11 @@ CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD=y CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y # CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE is not set # CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ is not set -CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_124_SOC=y -CONFIG_TEGRA_EMC_SCALING_ENABLE=y -CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS=y CONFIG_PCI=y CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA=y @@ -74,9 +71,6 @@ CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=y CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=y CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y CONFIG_CAN=y -CONFIG_CAN_RAW=y -CONFIG_CAN_BCM=y -CONFIG_CAN_DEV=y CONFIG_CAN_MCP251X=y CONFIG_BT=y CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM=y @@ -96,7 +90,6 @@ CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES=64 CONFIG_MTD=y CONFIG_MTD_M25P80=y CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR=y -CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y CONFIG_AD525X_DPOT=y CONFIG_AD525X_DPOT_I2C=y @@ -144,6 +137,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA20_SFLASH=y CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA20_SLINK=y CONFIG_PINCTRL_AS3722=y CONFIG_PINCTRL_PALMAS=y +CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X=y CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X_IRQ=y CONFIG_GPIO_PALMAS=y CONFIG_GPIO_TPS6586X=y @@ -291,5 +285,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_LL=y CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=y # CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANSI_CPRNG is not set -CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y CONFIG_CRC_CCITT=y -- 1.8.1.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-16 18:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-28 17:26 [PATCH] ARM: tegra: rebuild tegra_defconfig Stephen Warren
2013-05-28 21:30 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <51A521F5.2010206-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-29 13:38 ` Marc Dietrich
[not found] ` <2234363.J239kID5LN-D3pzGp0ZKuDWZbiwp4sFPyrtisivX6KghOMvlBiLbJSELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-29 15:29 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <51A61EEC.5040300-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-29 17:30 ` Marc Dietrich
2013-05-29 17:42 ` Stephen Warren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-16 18:04 Stephen Warren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox