From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] ARM: tegar: remove the limitation that Tegra114 can't support suspend Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:40:08 -0600 Message-ID: <51CB4398.8050900@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1372152475-18617-1-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com> <1372152475-18617-10-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1372152475-18617-10-git-send-email-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joseph Lo Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 06/25/2013 03:27 AM, Joseph Lo wrote: > The Tegra114 can support suspend function now, removing the limitation. OK, so this is the first point at which system suspend is enabled on Tegra114. However, some of the changes in earlier patches sounded like the might affect, or be required by, cpuidle too. Is that the case? If so, can you assure me that bisectability of Tegra114 cpuidle is maintained across this whole series?