From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org"
<swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
"thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:42:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE6FD9.8080206@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130710182154.GC22430-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
On 07/11/2013 02:21 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:25:37PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it directly when
>> implement linux thermal framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 8eeb141..2cb7f8e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -702,29 +702,37 @@ static u16 temp_to_u16_adt7461(struct lm90_data *data, long val)
>> * Sysfs stuff
>> */
>>
>> -static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static int read_temp8(struct device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> - struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> int temp;
>> + struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>>
> Why this reordering of variables ?
Oh, I didn't noticed it yet, thanks for your review, I will change it.
>
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[index]);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[index]);
>> else
>> - temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[index]);
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>> temp += 16000;
>>
>> + return temp;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> + int temp;
>> +
>> + temp = read_temp8(dev, attr->index);
>> +
>> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>
> Might as well simplify with
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", read_temp8(dev, attr->index));
Ok, I will update it.
>
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void write_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, long val)
>> {
>> static const u8 reg[8] = {
>> LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_LOW,
>> @@ -737,60 +745,76 @@ static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG,
>> };
>>
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - int nr = attr->index;
>> - long val;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> - if (err < 0)
>> - return err;
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>> val -= 16000;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> else
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_s8(val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_s8(val);
>>
>> - lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, nr >= 6);
>> - i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr], data->temp8[nr]);
>> + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, index >= 6);
>> + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[index], data->temp8[index]);
>> lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> + int index = attr->index;
>> + long val;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + write_temp8(dev, index, val);
>> +
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static int read_temp11(struct device *dev, int index)
>> {
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> - struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> int temp;
>> + struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>>
> Another unnecessary variable reorder.
>
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[index]);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[index]);
>> else
>> - temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[index]);
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index <= 2)
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index <= 2)
>> temp += 16000;
>>
>> + return temp;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> + int temp;
>> +
>> + temp = read_temp11(dev, attr->index);
>> +
>> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>
> Same simplification as above.
>
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void write_temp11(struct device *dev, int nr, int index, long val)
>> {
>> struct {
>> u8 high;
>> @@ -804,17 +828,8 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL, 1 }
>> };
>>
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - int nr = attr->nr;
>> - int index = attr->index;
>> - long val;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> - if (err < 0)
>> - return err;
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> if (data->kind == lm99 && index <= 2)
>> @@ -839,6 +854,23 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> + int nr = attr->nr;
>> + int index = attr->index;
>> + long val;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + write_temp11(dev, nr, index, val);
>> +
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 11:25 [PATCH v2 0/3] Lm90 Enhancements Wei Ni
2013-07-10 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1373455539-2831-2-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-10 18:21 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130710182154.GC22430-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-11 8:42 ` Wei Ni [this message]
[not found] ` <1373455539-2831-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-10 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1373455539-2831-3-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-10 17:05 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <20130710170552.GA15665-RcKxWJ4Cfj3FNiLNb7+IINdj8bHVeoWogfoxzgwHRXE@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-10 18:12 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130710181248.GA22430-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-10 18:49 ` Thierry Reding
2013-07-11 8:36 ` Wei Ni
2013-07-10 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130710181820.GB22430-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-11 8:40 ` Wei Ni
2013-07-10 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: (lm90) use enums for the indexes of temp8 and temp11 Wei Ni
2013-07-10 18:25 ` Guenter Roeck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-04 11:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] expose lm90 to thermal fw Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1393932664-13319-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-04 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes Wei Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE6FD9.8080206@nvidia.com \
--to=wni-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox