From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Ni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hwmon: (lm90) use macro defines for the status bit Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:09:43 +0800 Message-ID: <51E64337.6040004@nvidia.com> References: <1373615287-18502-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <1373615287-18502-3-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <20130715185727.4ebde8c4@endymion.delvare> <51E641C7.4000107@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51E641C7.4000107@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Guenter Roeck , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 07/17/2013 03:03 PM, Wei Ni wrote: > On 07/16/2013 12:57 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> Hi Wei, Guenter, >> >>> + >>> + if ((status & 0x7f) == 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) == 0) >>> + return false; >> >> It's a bit disappointing to not use the freshly introduced constants. >> That being said I agree it would make the code hard to read, so you can >> leave it as is. > > Sorry, I forgot it. > How about to define: > #define LM90_STATUS_MASK 0x7f > #define MAX6696_STATUS2 0xfe Sorry, it should be "#define MAX6696_STATUS2_MASK 0xfe". > > Or since Guenter is for vacation, I can just leave it as is, and wait > him back to talk about below issue. > >> >