From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: depend on ARCH_TEGRA, not ARCH_TEGRA_* Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:00:29 -0600 Message-ID: <51E81F2D.6060405@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1374014039-22469-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1374014039-22469-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Turquette Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 07/16/2013 04:33 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > I'm planning to remove CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC, leaving just ARCH_TEGRA. > This will reduce the number of configurations that need to be supported > by core Tegra code, e.g. CPU idle, hotplug. As a precursor, we need to > update Kconfig for all Tegra drivers not to reference ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC. > > The Tegra clock driver contains a fairly large amount of SoC-specific > code and data. Introduce explicit config options so that the user can > trim the set of supported SoCs if they wish. Default these to on, since > most people will probably want to enable support for all SoCs. This also > avoids the need to change any defconfig files. I'd like to defer actually applying this patch. There is some discussion (in the thread for the equivalent ASoC patches) re: the best way to handle the ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC Kconfig options which might affect this patch. Any review comment is still appreciated.