Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: cpuidle: use CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag

[Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

On 07/22/2013 06:43 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:32 +0800, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/22/2013 06:24 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:16 +0800, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>> On 07/22/2013 05:15 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 18:52 +0800, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/19/2013 09:14 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 20:41 +0800, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 07/18/2013 01:08 PM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 04:31 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/17/2013 04:15 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 03:51 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/16/2013 05:17 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 02:04 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06/25/2013 03:23 AM, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Use the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP and let the cpuidle framework
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to handle the CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER/EXIT when entering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this state.
>>>>>>>>>> ... [ discussion of issues with Joesph's patches applied]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so the problem occurs with the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag only on
>>>>>> tegra114, right ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I am a bit lost :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here are the issues that happen after apply CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP.
>>>>> 1) Tegra114/30
>>>>> The warning message at kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c:667
>>>>> tick_broadcast_oneshot_control could be triggered when doing CPU hot
>>>>> plug stress test.
>>>>
>>>> With the fix for tick-broadcast.c [1] ?
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 2) Tegra20
>>>>> The system is easy to stick or become lag.
>>>>> The CPU hot plug is easy to cause system stick too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix I suggested in another mail looks can fix all the issues above.
>>>>> I verified it again today on 3 different Tegra SoC platforms.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure your patch fixes the problem.
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if there isn't a underlaying problem which surface with
>>>> the flag.
>>
>> Does the attached patch changes something ?
>>
> No, the result is the same.

Ok, thanks for testing.

I will look more closely to the issue in the next days.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog