From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] clk: tegra: introduce common gen4 super clock Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:38:31 -0600 Message-ID: <52408AA7.7080003@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1379515331-19427-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1379515331-19427-13-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1379515331-19427-13-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Peter De Schrijver Cc: Prashant Gaikwad , Mike Turquette , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , Joseph Lo , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 09/18/2013 08:41 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > Introduce a common function which super clock initialization for Tegra114 > and beyond. Again, I'm sure that a lot of the data tables in this patch are actually SoC-specific, unless we expect Tegra114's pll_x (CPU PLL) to define the max CPU frequency on all future SoCs...