* [PATCH v2] regulator: core: set full constraints in regulator_init
@ 2013-11-06 7:19 Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1383722380-5845-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Ni @ 2013-11-06 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A
Cc: swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Wei Ni
When use DT to probe device, the probe routine may be erailier than
regulator_init_complete(), so at that time the full_constraints isn't
set yet, then the regulator_get() can't get the dummy regulator if the
regulator is physically present and enabled.
Set the full constraints in regulator_init() can fix this problem.
Discussed this in the link:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/8/40
Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 6382f0a..e80dd88 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3773,6 +3773,15 @@ static int __init regulator_init(void)
regulator_dummy_init();
+ /*
+ * Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for
+ * enabling full constraints and since it's much more natural
+ * with DT to provide them just assume that a DT enabled
+ * system has full constraints.
+ */
+ if (of_have_populated_dt())
+ has_full_constraints = true;
+
return ret;
}
@@ -3786,15 +3795,6 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
struct regulation_constraints *c;
int enabled, ret;
- /*
- * Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for
- * enabling full constraints and since it's much more natural
- * with DT to provide them just assume that a DT enabled
- * system has full constraints.
- */
- if (of_have_populated_dt())
- has_full_constraints = true;
-
mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
/* If we have a full configuration then disable any regulators
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: core: set full constraints in regulator_init
[not found] ` <1383722380-5845-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-11-06 7:23 ` Wei Ni
2013-11-06 9:07 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Ni @ 2013-11-06 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Cc: Wei Ni, swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
This is v2, previous version is:
[v1]: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg14562.html
On 11/06/2013 03:19 PM, Wei Ni wrote:
> When use DT to probe device, the probe routine may be erailier than
> regulator_init_complete(), so at that time the full_constraints isn't
> set yet, then the regulator_get() can't get the dummy regulator if the
> regulator is physically present and enabled.
> Set the full constraints in regulator_init() can fix this problem.
>
> Discussed this in the link:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/8/40
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 6382f0a..e80dd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3773,6 +3773,15 @@ static int __init regulator_init(void)
>
> regulator_dummy_init();
>
> + /*
> + * Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for
> + * enabling full constraints and since it's much more natural
> + * with DT to provide them just assume that a DT enabled
> + * system has full constraints.
> + */
> + if (of_have_populated_dt())
> + has_full_constraints = true;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -3786,15 +3795,6 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
> struct regulation_constraints *c;
> int enabled, ret;
>
> - /*
> - * Since DT doesn't provide an idiomatic mechanism for
> - * enabling full constraints and since it's much more natural
> - * with DT to provide them just assume that a DT enabled
> - * system has full constraints.
> - */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt())
> - has_full_constraints = true;
> -
> mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
>
> /* If we have a full configuration then disable any regulators
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: core: set full constraints in regulator_init
[not found] ` <1383722380-5845-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-06 7:23 ` Wei Ni
@ 2013-11-06 9:07 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-11-06 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Ni; +Cc: swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:19:40PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
> When use DT to probe device, the probe routine may be erailier than
> regulator_init_complete(), so at that time the full_constraints isn't
> set yet, then the regulator_get() can't get the dummy regulator if the
> regulator is physically present and enabled.
> Set the full constraints in regulator_init() can fix this problem.
As discussed this really needs to be done as part of deciding to use
device tree to avoid a window where the issue still remains.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 9:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-06 7:19 [PATCH v2] regulator: core: set full constraints in regulator_init Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1383722380-5845-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-06 7:23 ` Wei Ni
2013-11-06 9:07 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox