From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bilhuang Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Remodel Tegra cpufreq drivers to support Tegra series SoC Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:47:47 +0800 Message-ID: <52B02BD3.906@nvidia.com> References: <1386229462-3474-1-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Stephen Warren , "thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 12/17/2013 02:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 5 December 2013 13:14, Bill Huang wrote: >> This patch series remodel Tegra cpufreq driver to make it more easy to >> add new SoC support, in addition to that, adding probe function in the >> driver to let probe defer can be used to control init sequence when we >> are going to support DVFS. >> >> Changes since v2: >> >> - Fix Kconfig. >> - Rebase on top of branch 'cpufreq-next' on git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git. > > That's wrong base.. This branch is used only for Rafael to pull in > stuff and so it doesn't > get updated everyday.. > > You must rebase on Rafael's linux-next branch all the time. > OK thanks, is it branch pm-cpufreq?