From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikko Perttunen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: tegra: Remove TEGRA124_CLK_EMC from tegra124-car.h Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:28:36 +0300 Message-ID: <53D75B34.6030403@nvidia.com> References: <1405088313-20048-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1405088313-20048-3-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <53CD9620.3090301@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53CD9620.3090301@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren , Peter De Schrijver , Prashant Gaikwad , "mturquette@linaro.org" , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Yeah, I'll drop this one. - Mikko On 22/07/14 01:37, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/11/2014 08:18 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >> Remove the TEGRA124_CLK_EMC cell value define for tegra124-car >> from the binding headers. This clock has never been able to do >> anything and is being replaced with a separate EMC driver with >> its own device tree node. Removing the define ensures that any >> user will not mistakenly refer to <&tegra_car TEGRA124_CLK_EMC> >> instead of <&emc> or similar. > > If the clock physically exists in HW, I see no reason to remove it from > the binding definition, even if we don't implement it (or remove the > implementation of it) in the Linux clock driver. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >