From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: tegra: pmc: restrict compilation of suspend-related support to ARM Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:23:40 +0300 Message-ID: <54AE68BC.305@gmail.com> References: <20150107143354.GD1621@ulmo> <54AD4FB7.20600@gmail.com> <20150108084929.GA1987@ulmo.nvidia.com> <54AE5117.5020905@gmail.com> <20150108105818.GJ1987@ulmo.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150108105818.GJ1987@ulmo.nvidia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala , Paul Walmsley , Thierry Reding , Allen Martin , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 08.01.2015 13:58, Thierry Reding =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:42:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 08.01.2015 11:49, Thierry Reding =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>> I don't like changing this back to syscore_ops since it makes thing= s >>> less easier to follow. I also don't think that using PMC_SCRATCH41 = for >>> two different purposes is a good thing. There are a couple of >>> suggestions in my reply to your original patch. Could you investiga= te >>> whether any of those can be used to fix this instead? >>> >>> Thierry >>> >> >> I haven't received your reply. Double checked gmail inbox and mailin= g lists - >> nothing. It may just not propagated yet if you sent it today, otherw= ise can you >> please re-send it? >=20 > For some reason it hadn't gone out. Should be now, though. >=20 > Thierry >=20 Received now, thanks! Your proposal sounds interesting, I'll try it. --=20 Dmitry