From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: tegra: Add support for the Tegra132 CAR IP block Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:00:43 -0700 Message-ID: <54B0417B.6030409@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20141216203813.22980.2301.stgit@chromeos-P9X79> <20141216203829.22980.64446.stgit@chromeos-P9X79> <20150109111954.GB16465@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley , Thierry Reding Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , Prashant Gaikwad , Mike Turquette , Peter De Schrijver , Bill Huang , Stephen Boyd , Allen Martin , Paul Walmsley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 01/09/2015 01:52 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Thierry > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> >>> This patch is based on several patches from others: >>> >>> 1. a patch from Peter De Schrijver: >>> >>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.1/06094.html >>> >>> 2. a patch from Bill Huang ("clk: tegra: enable cclk_g at boot on >>> Tegra132"), and >>> >>> 3. a patch from Allen Martin ("clk: Enable tegra clock driver for >>> tegra132"). >> >> Doesn't this technically require Signed-off-bys from each of the above, >> then? > > I don't think so. Documentation/SubmittingPatches states: It's certainly been deemed acceptable in the past, if admittedly not optimal, for the person who is the "exit point" of an organization/company for the patch to be the only person to sign it off. The reason being they're vouching that the Certificate of Origin applies to all the company-sponsored work internal to the organization.