From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra20: Store CPU "resettable" status in IRAM
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:41:39 +0300
Message-ID: <54BD41D3.7030703@gmail.com>
References: <1421319545-23920-1-git-send-email-digetx@gmail.com> <1421319545-23920-2-git-send-email-digetx@gmail.com> <20150119141224.GF23778@ulmo.nvidia.com> <54BD3E3E.2040801@wwwdotorg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <54BD3E3E.2040801@wwwdotorg.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org

19.01.2015 20:26, Stephen Warren =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> Hopefully this works out. I suppose it's unlikely anyone will be runn=
ing code on
> the AVP upstrem, so any potential conflict with AVP's usage of IRAM i=
sn't likely
> to occur.
>
I don't see how it can conflict with AVP code. First KB of IRAM is rese=
rved for=20
reset handler. Am I missing something?

 From reset.h:

/* The first 1K of IRAM is permanently reserved for the CPU reset handl=
er */

> __tegra20_cpu1_resettable_status_offset has a lot of _ at the start. =
Should the
> symbol be named more normally? I guess at least it's consistent with =
the
> existing very "underscory" __tegra_cpu_reset_handler_start.
I also wasn't happy with "underscory" :) And yes, I left it for consist=
ency.=20
Please feel free to rename it, if needed.

--=20
Dmitry