From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: tegra-xusb: Correct lane mux options Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: <5629E050.50100@nvidia.com> References: <1444987441-25176-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <56212308.7050405@wwwdotorg.org> <56262563.3020201@nvidia.com> <562666FD.1020902@wwwdotorg.org> <562681CA.4060307@nvidia.com> <5626899C.6050804@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5626899C.6050804@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 20/10/15 19:36, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 10/20/2015 12:02 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 20/10/15 17:08, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 10/20/2015 05:28 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>> >>>> On 16/10/15 17:17, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>>> On 10/16/2015 03:24 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>>>> The description of the XUSB_PADCTL_USB3_PAD_MUX_0 register in the >>>>>> Tegra124 >>>>>> documentation implies that all functions (pcie, usb3 and sata) can be >>>>>> muxed onto to all lanes (pcie lanes 0-4 and sata lane 0). However, >>>>>> it has >>>>>> been confirmed that this is not the case and the mux'ing options much >>>>>> more >>>>>> limited. Unfortunately, the public documentation has not been >>>>>> updated to >>>>>> reflect this and so detail the actual mux'ing options here by >>>>>> function: >>>>> >>>>> FWIW, there's better documentation of this in the Tegra210 TRM, >>>>> although >>>>> the options have been expanded on that chip, so the docs don't >>>>> entirely >>>>> apply to Tegra124. >>>>> >>>>>> Function: Lanes: >>>>>> pcie1 x2: pcie3, pcie4 >>>>>> pcie1 x4: pcie1, pcie2, pcie3, pcie4 >>>>>> pcie2 x1 (option1): pcie0 >>>>>> pcie2 x1 (option2): pcie2 >>>>>> usb3 port 0: pcie0 >>>>>> usb3 port 1 (option 1): pcie1 >>>>>> usb3 port 1 (option 2): sata0 >>>>>> sata: sata0 [snip] >> That's fine with me. Are you ok with this patch as-is going upstream for >> now? > > Yes, the code change is fine as is. Care to ACK this so Linus can pick it up? Cheers Jon