From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [pinmux scripts PATCH] Add the Tegra210-smaug board Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:30:38 -0600 Message-ID: <5706C36E.6090305@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1459978380-8574-1-git-send-email-rklein@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1459978380-8574-1-git-send-email-rklein-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Rhyland Klein Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 04/06/2016 03:33 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote: > Tegra210-smaug is the name for the Google Pixel C platform. I assume tegra210-smaug.dts is the DT filename that will appear in the mainline kernel, and the board name that will appear in U-Boot if U-Boot gets ported? In the past there have been disconnects between what Google wanted to call boards and what NVIDIA called boards. I'd like to avoid applying this and having to renaming everything later, if possible. Does this table content match the production SW stack, and our Excel pinmux spreadsheet? If so, I'll apply this. If not, it would be good to at least document what the differences are, and hopefully track down why they exist and get our spreadsheet updated to match the production SW or vice-versa.