Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: tegra: Remove 0, prefix from unit-addresses

Stephen Warren
2016-04-11T15:55:56Z

On 04/11/2016 07:58 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>
> When Tegra124 support was first merged the unit-addresses of all devices
> were listed with a "0," prefix to encode the reg property's second cell.
> It turns out that this notation is not correct, and the "," separator is
> only used to separate fields in the unit address (such as the device and
> function number in PCI devices), not individual cells for addresses
> with more than one cell.

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

(Note that using the 0, prefix was correct at the time, but it appears
the rules have changed.)