From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 00/10] Add generic PM domain support for Tegra Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 11:36:55 -0800 Message-ID: <7h7fhk3c4o.fsf@baylibre.com> References: <1456501724-28477-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <20160302153556.GB21035@ulmo.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160302153556.GB21035-AwZRO8vwLAwmlAP/+Wk3EA@public.gmane.org> (Thierry Reding's message of "Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:35:56 +0100") Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Jon Hunter , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , Ulf Hansson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Thierry Reding writes: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:48:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Adds generic PM domain support for Tegra SoCs but this series only >> enables support for it on Tegra 64-bit devices. There is no reason why >> this cannot be enable for Tegra 32-bit devices, but to keep the patch >> series to a minimum only 64-bit devices are enabled so far. >> >> This series has been boot tested on Tegra210 as well as various 32-bit >> Tegra platforms. [...] >> Jon Hunter (10): >> PM / Domains: Fix removal of a subdomain >> PM / Domains: Add function to get the last domain added >> PM / Domains: Add function to remove a pm-domain > > Ulf, Kevin, Rafael, > > It's too late to take these patches through the Tegra tree for v4.6, but > if Jon can get the above three patches ready before the merge window, > would you be willing to pick them up into your trees for v4.6? It's a bit late in the cycle, but since one is a fix and the other two add functions that aren't (yet) used, I think it would be fine to get them in for v4.6. But, the final decision is with Rafael. > Doing so > might make it easier to deal with the dependencies. The prerequisites > would already be in Linus' tree when I apply the Tegra bits for v4.7. Yeah, makes sense. > I don't mind taking all of it through the Tegra tree for v4.7, though. I > can provide a stable branch with the PM / Domains patches for you to > pull in, in case there are any conflicts. I think it makes the most sense for these prereqs to merge through linux-pm. Let's see what Rafael thinks about the timing. Kevin