From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Mark APB clock as critical Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 15:47:32 +0300 Message-ID: <803890bc-e3fe-134a-2127-3363187d04f2@gmail.com> References: <1508757172-13030-1-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <18f57c1f-add0-908a-6a26-7cc81f29d7d9@gmail.com> <95c14859-a2c7-1c61-adba-bd6c16155c01@gmail.com> <9d479a38-f40b-0e58-09c3-d06e9ee32a25@nvidia.com> <6264cf17-0850-37dd-ca92-9362521d2db6@gmail.com> <236aa250-3b9b-94de-0978-0fb8546d504d@nvidia.com> <20171201084818.GI32106@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171201084818.GI32106@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter De Schrijver , Jon Hunter Cc: Prashant Gaikwad , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 01.12.2017 11:48, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:39:22PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 30/11/17 13:24, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>> On 30.11.2017 14:31, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>> >>>> On 29/11/17 23:13, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >>>>> On 30.11.2017 01:55, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I've asked you to re-test Tegra114/124 or whatever was failing for you with the >>>>> PLL_M being marked as critical instead of PCLK. Maybe it was PLL_M that actually >>>>> caused trouble on Tegra114/124. >>>> >>>> Please share the exact change you would like me to test and I will. >>> >>> Please try this: >> >> I tried the patch, but this does not work for Tegra124 it still hangs. >> Tracing the clk calls the last thing I see is ... >> >> [ 2.687846] tegra124-dfll 70110000.clock: couldn't get vdd_cpu regulator >> [ 2.694403] clk_prepare: hclk_div >> [ 2.695929] clk_prepare_complete: hclk_div >> [ 2.700027] clk_prepare: hclk >> [ 2.702947] clk_prepare_complete: hclk >> [ 2.706673] clk_prepare: pclk_div >> [ 2.709986] clk_prepare_complete: pclk_div >> [ 2.714039] clk_prepare: pclk >> [ 2.716985] clk_prepare_complete: pclk >> [ 2.720739] clk_prepare: apbdma >> [ 2.723833] clk_prepare_complete: apbdma >> [ 2.727736] clk_enable: hclk_div >> [ 2.730940] clk_enable_complete: hclk_div >> [ 2.734926] clk_enable: hclk >> [ 2.737788] clk_enable_complete: hclk >> [ 2.741426] clk_enable: pclk_div >> [ 2.744633] clk_enable_complete: pclk_div >> [ 2.748619] clk_enable: pclk >> [ 2.751481] clk_enable_complete: pclk >> [ 2.755120] clk_enable: apbdma >> [ 2.758153] clk_enable_complete: apbdma >> [ 2.762390] clk_disable: apbdma >> [ 2.765088] clk_disable_complete: apbdma >> [ 2.768986] clk >> >> So I believe this change is correct and that Peter's analysis on IRC >> seems correct, that this change has exposed another issue with the clock >> driver. >> >> Peter, can you summarise which other clocks should be made critical? > > The following clocks should be critical: > > pclk > hclk > sclk > emc > mc > pll_p > > I think that's it. Could you please elaborate why pll_p should be critical? Is it applicable to all Tegra generations?