From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Subject: Re: How to test new bootloaders on Jetson TX1? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <8320e1df-774c-65c1-28ae-96e1b90ad178@suse.de> References: <5ff3ffde-653c-ea50-490c-efcc6dccecc2@suse.de> <2089c895-7992-9741-a471-fae5b410d4b7@kapsi.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2089c895-7992-9741-a471-fae5b410d4b7-/1wQRMveznE@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mikko Perttunen Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, U-Boot , Alexander Graf , Mian Yousaf Kaukab , Tom Warren , Varun Wadekar List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Hi Mikko, Am 15.02.2018 um 08:56 schrieb Mikko Perttunen: > In the cboot + U-Boot combination, cboot loads U-Boot from the usual > kernel partition (LNX or kernel depending on system), so flashing U-Boot > there should do the trick. I believe this did indeed change in some L4T > version, so the wiki page needs to be updated. Tom should know more > about this. Thanks for explaining. The LNX partition is getting a boot.img - what is the relation to the four U-Boot files? flash.sh source is not really helping here. Might any changes to RP1 and/or DTB partitions be necessary to match my newer U-Boot, or does U-Boot use an internal .dtb these days? Is there any more efficient way to flash just U-Boot? -k LNX possibly? I had played with the -L option before (which mentions u-boot-dtb.bin), but recall it ran into some form of checksum error on boot when passing it my file... > I expect Varun to know the details about ATF, but I'll check if I can > find some answer myself. Thanks again for your efforts. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)