From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] irqchip/tegra: Clean up coding style Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:18:36 +0100 Message-ID: <867e7hnin7.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20190811183044.13925-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20190811183044.13925-2-digetx@gmail.com> <86a7cdnmpx.wl-maz@kernel.org> <4fbc5a90-e110-b020-15d3-c4bbe81b15cc@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4fbc5a90-e110-b020-15d3-c4bbe81b15cc@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Peter De Schrijver , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:40:27 +0100, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > 13.08.2019 17:50, Marc Zyngier пишет: > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 19:30:44 +0100, > > Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> > >> Make coding style to conform to the kernel's standard by fixing checkpatch > >> warnings about "line over 80 characters". > > > > The last time I used a VT100 was about 30 years ago. I still think > > this was one of the most brilliant piece of equipment DEC ever > > produced, but I replaced it at the time with a Wyse 50 that had a 132 > > column mode. But even then, I could make my XTerm as wide as I wanted, > > and things haven't regressed much since. > > > > More seriously, I don't consider the 80 column limit a hard one, and > > I'm pretty happy with code that spans more that 80 columns if that > > allows to read an expression without messing with the flow. > > Usually I have multiple source files opened side-by-side and the > view sizes are tuned for 80 chars, it messes at least my flow when > something goes over 80 chars. > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko > >> --- > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c | 15 +++++---------- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c > >> index 14dcacc2ad38..f829a5990dae 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c > >> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tegra.c > >> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static struct tegra_ictlr_info *lic; > >> > >> static inline void tegra_ictlr_write_mask(struct irq_data *d, unsigned long reg) > >> { > >> - void __iomem *base = (void __iomem __force *)d->chip_data; > >> + void __iomem *base = lic->base[d->hwirq / 32]; > > > > (1) This is an undocumented change > > In my opinion this is a very trivial change and then the end result > is absolutely the same, hence nothing to document here. Just read > the code, I'd say. And that is the very reason why I won't take any of your patches any time soon. M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.